Appendix I – SVE Technology Description

ESTCP (2002) Air Sparging Design Paradigm

ESTCP (2002) based their design paradigm on the conclusion that long-term air sparging performance (cleanup levels and times) cannot be predicted reliably from data collected during short-term pilot tests. As a result, given the importance of air distribution and our inability to predict it, ESTCP proposed an approach where the actual air distribution in the target treatment zone is characterized during the pilot-testing and full-scale implementation phases. Because of their approach, pilot testing and monitoring should be understood in context of the overall design paradigm, which consists of five main steps:

  • Site characterization and development of site conceptual model
  • Preliminary feasibility assessment
  • Pilot testing
  • Design
  • Monitoring

The pilot testing is divided into two approaches, 1) standard design approach and 2) site-specific design approach. For each of these two approaches there are default designs and recommended monitoring. The flow chart for air sparging design including pilot testing is shown in Figure B-1.

The standard design approach recommends the following data collection: injection pressure versus flow rate test, transient pressure response test, dissolved oxygen measurements, helium tracer test and soil gas sampling. Based on this data set, injection wells based on 15 ft centers and 20 ft3/min injection rate are recommended. The site-specific design approach recommends the standard methods plus sulphur hexafluoride tracer test to assess air distribution more accurately.

This appendix provides an overview of the technology, site conditions conducive to SVE, generalized site types for applicability of SVE, and SVE design.

Overview of Technology

SVE is the application of a vacuum to unsaturated (vadose zone) soils to induce advective soil vapor flow toward extraction wells and remove volatile and some semi-volatile contaminants from soil. Once removed from the soil, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are typically removed or destroyed using an aboveground treatment process such as granular activated carbon, or catalytic or thermal oxidation (US EPA 2006). SVE is primarily a composition-based remedy because higher volatility VOCs are removed at greater rates than lower volatility VOCs. Consequently, SVE can be used to target remediation of lighter COCs such as benzene.4

The phase change and mass removal typically decrease during the treatment life cycle. During early stages of remediation, the primary mass removal is from air pathways of low resistance (higher permeability soils), where chemicals in adsorbed phase or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) partition into the moving air. Contaminants in lower permeability soils will not be removed by advection because soil vapors will preferentially flow through higher permeability soils. When the mass in higher permeability soils becomes mostly depleted, the rate of mass removal may approach a low value or cumulative mass recovery may approach an asymptotic value. This is because contaminants in lower permeability silts and clays and within the capillary fringe, if present, must desorb and diffuse into an advective flow path before they can be removed by the SVE system. If the rate of diffusion is slow, the time duration for removing VOCs may be significantly extended (US EPA 1991). US EPA (2018) describes a two-compartment model (coarse- and fine-grained) for prediction of concentrations and clean-up times when there are mass transfer limitations resulting from slow diffusive transport in fine-grained soil layers.

The addition of air through SVE may result in enhanced aerobic biodegradation and consequently SVE is closely related to bioventing (refer to Bioventing Factsheet). Because there is often contamination at or below the water table, remediation through air sparging will often be an additional component to the SVE system.

Exit Strategy Toolkit

Acronyms

air / bio sparging (AS)
Air-NAPL interface (ANI)
benzene toluene ethylbenzene xylene (BTEX)
calculated groundwater surface (CGWS)
chemicals of concern (COCs)
compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA)
conceptual site model (CSM)
contaminant mass discharge (CMD)
cubic feet per hour (cfh)
cubic feet per minute (cfm)
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
dissolved oxygen (DO)
dual pump liquid extraction (DPLE)
dual-phase extraction (DPE)
electrical resistance tomography (ERT)
greenhouse gas (GHG)
hydraulic profiling tool (HPT)
in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO)
in-situ air sparging (IAS)
laser-induced fluorescence (LIF)
light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs)
LNAPL conceptual site model (LCSM)
maximum concentration level (MCL)
messenger RNA (mRNA)
miles per hour (mph)
molecular biological tools (MBT)
monitored natural attenuation (MNA)
multi-phase extraction (MPE)
Multiple Lines of Evidence (MLE)
NAPL/water interface (NWI)
natural attenuation (NA)
natural source-zone depletion (NSZD)
no-further action (NFA)
non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL)
oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)
oxygen pulse injection system (OPIS)
petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs)
programmable logic controller (PLC)
pump and treat (P&T)
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
radius of influence (ROI)
remedial action objective (RAO)
ribonucleic acid (RNA)
soil vapor extraction (SVE)
stable isotope probing (SIP)
standard cubic feet per minute (scfm)
surfactant-enhanced subsurface remediation (SESR)
time-domain reflectometry (TDR)
total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH)
total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs)
two-phase extraction (TPE)
underground storage tank (UST)
vacuum enhanced fluid recovery (VEFR)
vacuum enhanced groundwater extraction (VEGE)
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
zone of influence (ZOI)